Cape Fear (1962)

I was testing my self-control to see how long I could last without seeing a Robert Mitchum film. Well, I finally succumbed. But yes, this I’ll say: this is a very different Mitchum film from the ones I’ve been reviewing all this while. In Cape Fear (the original film, not the 1991 remake), Mitchum is pitted against Gregory Peck in a chilling tale of an ex-convict out to have his revenge on the man responsible for his conviction.

Robert Mitchum and Gregory Peck in Cape Fear

Sam Bowden (Gregory Peck) is a lawyer who, eight years ago, was the prime witness in a case of criminal assault (and rape? It’s not explicitly stated). Bowden came upon the victim in a parking lot while her attacker was in the middle of mauling her; the interruption made the man go even more berserk, resulting in the woman spending a month in hospital. Bowden’s testimony sent the attacker, Max Cady (Robert Mitchum) to prison for eight years. But Cady’s out now, and he’s in town. Worse still, he wants Bowden to know.

Max Cady shows up in Bowden's town

Bowden is inclined to not take Cady too seriously, but he starts getting worried when he finds Cady trailing him and his family: his wife Peggy (Polly Bergen) and their daughter Nancy (Lori Martin).

Bowden discovers Cady's been following his family

Bowden gets nervous and has a chat with Mark Dutton (Martin Balsam), his friend and the chief of police. Dutton reminds Bowden that they have nothing on which to hold Cady: he’s served his sentence, he’s even (as per law) registered with the police after moving to this town. But Cady’s likely to be broke, so they could arrest him on a charge of vagrancy and put him by for six months.

Bowden has a chat with Dutton

Dutton’s men go and pick up Cady just as he’s getting ready to pick up a pretty brunette called Diane Taylor (Barrie Chase), whom he’s spotted in a bar. She’s new in town, out for a good time, and quite clearly finds Cady very attractive.
Unfortunately for Bowden, Cady can’t be arrested as a vagrant. It turns out he’s recently sold a house he’d inherited, and so has over five grand stashed away in a bank account. And he’s spent the past eight years studying the law; he knows his legal rights. The police have to let Cady go.

Cady foils the police

The next day, the Bowdens’ dog is poisoned, and though there’s no proof, Sam Bowden can guess who’s behind it. All he can do right now is to tell Peggy and Nancy about Max Cady, and to warn them.

Bowden warns Peggy and Nancy

The day after, Bowden gets an urgent summons from Dutton’s office. When Bowden arrives at the police station, he finds Cady there, with the lawyer he’s employed. This is Dave Grafton (Jack Kruschen), a slimy character who specialises in protecting ex cons. A breath of suspicion, and Grafton will have Dutton and his team in the dock for police brutality. Between them, Dutton and Bowden manage to put Grafton with his back to the wall, but one thing’s clear: without evidence, they can’t touch Max Cady.

Grafton represents Cady - and runs into Dutton and Bowden

Once they’re on their own, Dutton offers an off-the-record suggestion: Bowden should hire a private detective, Charles Sievers (Telly Savalas) to sort out this business. Bowden wants everything to be due process, but finally agrees to see what Sievers can do. Dutton promises to depute a man to tail Cady, so at least they’ll know what he’s up to. In the meantime, Cady has picked up Diane Taylor, who gets him to drive her to the flat she’s rented. Dutton’s man phones back with the news and suggests they nab Cady for `lewd vagrancy’.

Cady picks up Diane Taylor

By the time the police arrive, Cady has raped Diane, thrashed her within an inch of her life, and gone. Gone too, is the bright and erotic creature Diane Taylor once was: Cady’s left behind a nervous wreck, battered and broken and too scared to say a word to the police. Dutton calls Sievers and Bowden, but Diane refuses to testify against Cady. Not only is she too scared, she’s also worried about what people will say when all the gory details are published. Nobody in the small town she comes from will ever forget it.

A battered Diane refuses to testify against Cady

There’s nothing they can do about it—she’s adamant—so Dutton and Bowden have to let Diane go, and she leaves town.
Soon after, Bowden finds Cady following his family once again. This time, it’s at the wharf, where the Bowdens are preparing their boat for a day’s sailing. While Bowden and Peggy go off on various errands, Nancy stays on the boat, brushing up the paint, not realising that Cady’s watching her all the while.

Cady watches Nancy at the wharf

When Bowden returns and discovers Cady, Cady has the gall to tell him that Nancy is “gettin’ to be as juicy as your wife, ain’t she?” That makes Bowden let fly at Cady, but nothing comes of it, ultimately—except that Bowden is now very scared for Nancy.

...and has a run-in with Bowden

Cady isn’t to be shaken off so easily, and turns up again one day when Peggy leaves her car in front of Nancy’s school and goes off shopping nearby until school gets over. Nancy gets in the car, watches the school empty out, and sees a lone man, big and broad, dark haired and wearing a panama hat, walking leisurely down the street… straight towards their car.

Nancy sees Max Cady approaching...

And from then on, things go careening out of control for the Bowdens. Max Cady is obviously out to get them. But he’s protected by the wily Dave Grafton and by the fact that there’s nothing the police can legally pin onto him. Bowden knows Cady’s drawing swiftly closer, and Nancy and Peggy are no longer safe. He can offer Cady money, but will Cady settle for money? He can hire goons to thrash Cady, but will that suffice?
Or he can stand by and watch as his wife and daughter are traumatised by a man who’s utterly without scruple or mercy or a shred of goodness in him.

What I liked about this film:
Robert Mitchum! Yes, of course: I adore Mitchum, but in Cape Fear it’s his acting I have to applaud, he’s so good—or should that be so ruthlessly, chillingly evil? Max Cady smiles, flirts, and has a man-about-town air about him that’s sexually attractive, but look into those hard, calculating eyes and you get a glimpse of just how much cold-blooded malevolence this man is capable of. If this was the only Mitchum film I’d ever seen, I’d hate the man.

Robert Mitchum in Cape Fear

The frames. The director’s J Lee Thompson, and he uses everyday objects—a water pipe, the headboard of a bed, a waiter’s arm, a rack of glasses—to create some memorable visuals.

A frame from Cape Fear: a waiter's arm, and Robert Mitchum

Another frame: Lori Martin and a water pipe

And another: Polly Bergen and a rack of glasses

What I didn’t like:
The Diane Taylor character. Call me prudish or whatever, but I just couldn’t summon up any pity for her. Anyone can see Max Cady isn’t a gentle soul: he’s very apparently predatory (She even sums it up by calling him—in a hoarse, erotic whisper—“Coarse, rustic, barbaric”). Why did this idiot of a girl go with him, then? Sex is all very well, but shouldn’t there be some instinct for self-preservation? And then, when the police and Bowden are urging her to file charges against Cady, she refuses because people back home will come to know what she’s been up to. Well, I’d have suggested circumspection in the first place. Irritating female.
There are a few holes in the plot, illogical behaviour that doesn’t make sense. For instance, when Peggy knows Nancy’s school’s about to give over and Nancy will come out to, why doesn’t she leave the store and come back? (That’s the excuse she later gives for having not been in the car when Nancy emerges from school). Doesn’t she realise just how much more urgent protecting her daughter is?

Despite that, this is a good film. Taut, with the tension building up quickly, and with one of the eeriest and most scary villains I’ve ever seen onscreen.

Little bit of trivia:
There’s a story about how, during the shooting of a fight between Bowden and Cady, Gregory Peck accidentally actually punched Mitchum. Though it must’ve hurt like hell, Mitchum continued shooting, mainly because he realised Peck hadn’t meant to hit him. The punch laid Mitchum up for a couple of days and he later remarked that he wouldn’t feel sorry for anyone dumb enough to pick a fight with Peck!


15 thoughts on “Cape Fear (1962)

  1. *What I didn’t like: The Diane Taylor character.*
    yeah, it is difficult to like such characters, but the fact is that there are real people like that. Mainly in conservative societies (people back home) can such things happen. I think she is a woman who likes sex and the danger associated with it, just adds to the thrill.
    Somehow I understand her, but not necessarily support her actions!
    She is a victim of herself and the society!


  2. Yes, it’s a very good film – and not too difficult to get hold of (I found it in a fairly small store in NOIDA!)

    And yes, I do agree that there are people like Diane Taylor. You know, the type of woman who will sleep with/marry/whatever a man even if she realises he’s dangerous, simply because he’s got a magnetism that she can’t resist – and because there’s a thrill in that dare. Dysfunctional, I suppose, but believable. I just didn’t like her, that’s all. Sounds weird when, after all, I didn’t like Cady either (hated him!) but there was something indefinable about Diane as a victim that didn’t make me sympathise with her… and I guess I’m used to old films being too black and white as far as characterisation is concerned: the audience has to sympathise with the victim.



  3. I saw the remake, but haven’t seen this…mostly because I don’t like being scared (I hated the remake for that reason). Mitchum and Peck though…YUM.


  4. Somehow onscreen criminals don’t scare me, but I get scared with supernatural stuff. Not even fantasy supernatural (werewolves, vampires, etc – those are just kinda yucky) – but ghosts. But I’d think if you’re not a fan of scary films, you’d be better off steering clear of this one as well as Mitchum’s other fabulouus criminal film, The Night of the Hunter: that’s equally creepy.

    But Peck and Mitchum together, even when they were past their prime, are quite a glorious combo! ;-)


  5. This one sounds absolutely terrifying! Its played on TCM often enough but inspite of Peck and Mitchum being in the cast, I’ve never been able to bring myself to watch it. Inspite of all the murder mysteries I read, something like this is pretty likely to give me nightmares! lol

    PS: That guy in the ninth screencap looks like O P Ralhan!


  6. Hehehe…I hadn’t noticed, but yes, you’re right, he does look a lot like O P Ralhan. That’s Telly Savalas, by the way – in one of the few roles where I’ve seen him with his hair! :-)

    Mitchum is very good in this film. Terrifically creepy. Don’t watch it if you don’t like getting scared.


  7. Mitchum & Peck are just great in this one. Although the remake wasn’t bad (for a change), I woudl always put my money on this one…its so tightly told and the two leads are just so good!


  8. I haven’t seen the remake, but I noticed that a lot of people on the imdb message boards seem to think this version was better than the later one! In any case, I’m quite happy just watching this one, if only because of Peck and Mitchum – they’re so good.


  9. Cape Fear was quite controversial back in the day. Thompson was looking to push the Code as far as it would allow. The egg smearing scene ruffled a lot of feathers.

    Peck and Thompson continued their partnership from the successful Alistair MacLean adaptation The Guns of Navarone (1961). They did two more movies together – Mackenna’s Gold and The Chairman (both 1969) but the results weren’t as stellar as their first two collaborations.

    In the scene where Mitchum is frisked and strip-searched, he comments jocularly: “You might want to look closer, I’ve got a few jolts of horse stashed under the collar.” That is very likely a tongue-in-cheek reference to Mitchum’s 1948 arrest and conviction for possession of marijuana. Whether it was scripted or ad-libbed, I can’t guess.

    About visual flourishes: In the scene where the girl is (seemingly) pursued by Cady, note that the camera is always centred below the man’s waist. A subtle reference to the theme of underage rape.

    About the remake: Saw it last year for the first time, immediately after second viewing of the original. Hated it. Very disappointing, considering it had the hand of a master like Scorsese behind it. Some people admire this more because the family is not picture-perfect but ‘dysfunctional’, which was all the rage back then and still is, because it is somehow more ‘realistic’. It did not work for me. The daughter in the remake is shown to be more sexually aware – another ‘realistic’ touch – and Cady almost-seduces her by pretending to be more sympathetic with her teenage angst. But later, when he kills the maid, her hitherto sympathetic attitude towards him goes through a sea change all of a sudden, which is downright nonsensical because her supposedly ‘bestie’ relationship with the maid is never shown or hinted at.


    • Thank you for those insights! I think I watched Cape Fear before I read about Mitchum’s having done time for possessing marijuana, so I completely missed that possible reference to the incident – your recounting of it made me grin.

      I have never been able to summon up the courage to watch the ‘new’ Cape Fear. Far too many remakes are so absolutely horrible (True Grit, to some extent, was an exception). Your review of it further induces me to stay away. :-)


      • I forgot to mention this yesterday – I have also read The Executioners, the novel which Cape Fear is based on. Not a bad novel, but a total damp squib of a climax. But Cady here is more evil and unhinged than in the film – he actually tries to kill the children rather than simply inflict psychological torture.


        • I’m curious about the book, now… will look out for it on the off-chance that someday I will be able to get through the many piles of books all across my house and read that one. The idea of a Cady who actually tries to kill the kids makes more sense to me than one who merely tries to frighten them; someone as cold-blooded a creature as him should probably have realized that letting the children get away (considering they’re old enough to recognize and name him) would be dangerous for him.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.